U.S. v. Lawson, 3:16-cr-00121-TMB-DMS. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Alaska
Number: infdco20180711846
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2018
Summary: PROCEEDINGS : ORDER FROM CHAMBERS TIMOTHY M. BURGESS , District Judge . Having reviewed de novo Magistrate Judge Smith's Initial Report and Recommendation on Defendant's Motion to Preclude Government's Expert from Offering Opinion Testimony Regarding Conclusions of Law (Docket 197), in conjunction with the parties' Objections and Responses (Dockets 200 & 207), and the Magistrate's Final Report and Recommendation (Docket 300), the Court hereby adopts and accepts the Final Report and Reco
Summary: PROCEEDINGS : ORDER FROM CHAMBERS TIMOTHY M. BURGESS , District Judge . Having reviewed de novo Magistrate Judge Smith's Initial Report and Recommendation on Defendant's Motion to Preclude Government's Expert from Offering Opinion Testimony Regarding Conclusions of Law (Docket 197), in conjunction with the parties' Objections and Responses (Dockets 200 & 207), and the Magistrate's Final Report and Recommendation (Docket 300), the Court hereby adopts and accepts the Final Report and Recom..
More
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER FROM CHAMBERS
TIMOTHY M. BURGESS, District Judge.
Having reviewed de novo Magistrate Judge Smith's Initial Report and Recommendation on Defendant's Motion to Preclude Government's Expert from Offering Opinion Testimony Regarding Conclusions of Law (Docket 197), in conjunction with the parties' Objections and Responses (Dockets 200 & 207), and the Magistrate's Final Report and Recommendation (Docket 300), the Court hereby adopts and accepts the Final Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Consequently, Defendant's Motion to Preclude Government's Expert from Offering Opinion Testimony Regarding Conclusions of Law (Docket 100), is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
