Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LVDG Series 125 v. Welles, 3:13-cv-00503-LRH-WGC. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20161024b08 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND LITIGATION DEADLINES (First Request) WILLIAM G. COBB , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") together with LVDG Series 125, established under LVDG LLC ("LVDG") and MTC Financial Inc. dba Trustee Corps ("MTC Financial" and jointly with Wells Fargo and LVDG, the "Parties"), through their respective attorneys, as follows: STIPULATION WHEREAS, LVDG filed an Amended
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND LITIGATION DEADLINES

(First Request)

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") together with LVDG Series 125, established under LVDG LLC ("LVDG") and MTC Financial Inc. dba Trustee Corps ("MTC Financial" and jointly with Wells Fargo and LVDG, the "Parties"), through their respective attorneys, as follows:

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, LVDG filed an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 63) on July 21, 2016 pursuant to an order of this Court granting LVDG appropriate leave to add parties and amend its Complaint; and

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint names Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") as a new defendant. In addition, it amends the claims that were previously brought against Harold M. Welles and Valerie M. Welles (collectively, the "Welles").

WHEREAS, summonses for service of the Amended Complaint have been issued against new Defendant Freddie Mac, as well as the Welles. (ECF Nos. 74-76); and

WHEREAS, Freddie Mac was served with the summons and Amended Complaint on October 17, 2016 (ECF No. 78) and the Welles were served with the summons and Amended Complaint on October 17 and October 18, 2016, respectively (ECF No. 78-80).

WHEREAS, although counsel for Wells Fargo Bank may represent Freddie Mac, neither Freddie Mac or the Welles have yet appeared in response to the Amended Complaint.

WHEREAS, the Parties understand and agree that additional discovery and motion practice will be necessary once Freddie Mac and the Welles appear; and

WHEREAS, MTC Financial has filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 64) the Amended Complaint, which Motion has been fully briefed; and

WHEREAS, Wells Fargo and LVDG have agreed that Wells Fargo's response to the Amended Complaint will be due on the same date as the response due by Freddie Mac; and

WHEREAS, the current litigation deadlines are to be reset upon the appearance of Freddie Mac and the Welles.

NOW THEREFORE the Parties agree and request this Court enter an order allowing for an extension of the current litigation deadlines to be reset once Freddie Mac and the Welles have appeared in this case. The Parties further agree to appear for a status conference at the request of the court. The Parties agree that this request for extending discovery and dispositive motions deadlines is made in good faith and not for any improper purpose, but rather to afford the Parties and the newly appearing parties the opportunity to complete discovery in this litigation and with respect to the Amended Complaint.

Because Freddie Mac and the Welles have not yet appeared, the Parties agree that upon the appearance of said defendants, they will meet and confer to propose new litigation deadlines consistent with the needs of all parties and the claims and defenses of this case. The Parties further agree that they will consider those elements contained in the Court's Minute Order (ECF No. 51) and will submit a supplemental Case Management Report consistent with the Court's Minute Order.

This is the Parties' first request to extend litigation deadlines.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer