Williams v. Womble, 2:15-cv-728-ECM. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190507605
Visitors: 12
Filed: May 06, 2019
Latest Update: May 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , Chief District Judge . On April 5, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 69). After an independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (doc. 69) be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (docs. 22, 27, 40) be and are hereby GRANTED.
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , Chief District Judge . On April 5, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 69). After an independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: 1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (doc. 69) be and is hereby ADOPTED. 2. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (docs. 22, 27, 40) be and are hereby GRANTED. ..
More
ORDER
EMILY C. MARKS, Chief District Judge.
On April 5, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 69). After an independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (doc. 69) be and is hereby ADOPTED.
2. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (docs. 22, 27, 40) be and are hereby GRANTED.
3. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against Plaintiff for which execution may issue.
A separate Judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
