Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Buesing Corporation, an Arizona corporation v. Helix Electric of Nevada LLC, 2:16-cv-01439-JCM-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180122930 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Buesing Corporation ("Buesing") and Defendant/Counterclaimant Helix Electric of Nevada, LLC ("Helix"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree and further move the Court to
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Buesing Corporation ("Buesing") and Defendant/Counterclaimant Helix Electric of Nevada, LLC ("Helix"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree and further move the Court to extend the time for Defendant to file its reply in support of its motion for partial summary judgment and response to Plaintiff's cross-motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No(s). 40 and 41), filed on January 8, 2018 from January 18, 2018 to February 1, 2018; and for Plaintiff to file its reply in support of its cross-motion for partial summary judgment by not later than February 15, 2018. The request is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay and as a result of Plaintiff having filed a cross-motion for summary judgment in response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment that contains 28 exhibits, totally 219 pages. Originally, Defendant's counsel contemplated only filing a reply in support of its motion for summary judgment by January 18, 2018 pursuant to the stipulation and order filed on December 15, 2017 and December 19, 2017, (ECF No(s). 38 and 39), respectively.

This is the first stipulation for extension of time for Defendant to file its reply and response to Plaintiff's cross-motion and for Plaintiff to file its reply in support of its cross-motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No(s). 40 and 41).

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer