SMILEY v. RYAN, CV-12-2525-PHX-FJM. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20141219854
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. MARTONE, District Judge. Before the court is Petitioner's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (doc. 6), Respondents' response (doc. 20) and supplemental responses (docs. 24, 30 and 36), and Petitioner's reply (doc. 21) and supplemental replies (doc. 28 and 39). We also have before us the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge concluding that Petitioner's claims are procedurally defaulted or procedurally barred and
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. MARTONE, District Judge. Before the court is Petitioner's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (doc. 6), Respondents' response (doc. 20) and supplemental responses (docs. 24, 30 and 36), and Petitioner's reply (doc. 21) and supplemental replies (doc. 28 and 39). We also have before us the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge concluding that Petitioner's claims are procedurally defaulted or procedurally barred and r..
More
ORDER
FREDERICK J. MARTONE, District Judge.
Before the court is Petitioner's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 6), Respondents' response (doc. 20) and supplemental responses (docs. 24, 30 and 36), and Petitioner's reply (doc. 21) and supplemental replies (doc. 28 and 39). We also have before us the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge concluding that Petitioner's claims are procedurally defaulted or procedurally barred and recommending that the amended petition be dismissed with prejudice (doc. 40). Petitioner has not objected to the report and recommendation and the time for doing so has expired.
Pursuant to Rule 8(b), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, we accept the recommended decision of the Magistrate Judge (doc. 40). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED DENYING and DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 6).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because dismissal of the habeas petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable.
Source: Leagle
