MARTIN v. HARRIS, 2:14cv1184-MHT (WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150220882
Visitors: 27
Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2015
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Pending before the court is the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be denied. No objections have been filed. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and upon consideration of the recommendation, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. no. 9) is adopted. 2. Plaintiff's motion for prelimina
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Pending before the court is the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be denied. No objections have been filed. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and upon consideration of the recommendation, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. no. 9) is adopted. 2. Plaintiff's motion for preliminar..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pending before the court is the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction be denied. No objections have been filed. Upon an independent and de novo review of the record and upon consideration of the recommendation, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. no. 9) is adopted.
2. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 1) is denied.
3. This cause is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings.
Source: Leagle
