Lee v. Adams, 2:14cv1073-MHT. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180228995
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2018
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, who at the time of filing was a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit bringing claims that defendant subjected him to a warrantless arrest and failed to read him his Miranda rights. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff, who at the time of filing was a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit bringing claims that defendant subjected him to a warrantless arrest and failed to read him his Miranda rights. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de ..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, who at the time of filing was a state prisoner, filed this lawsuit bringing claims that defendant subjected him to a warrantless arrest and failed to read him his Miranda rights. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
