NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER

SUSAN R. BOLTON, District Judge.

Petitioner filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on April 6, 2015. Petitioner "raises one ground for relief for violation of his Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights based on the trial court altering the plea agreement without the knowledge or agreement of Petitioner, prosecutorial misconduct, and denial of the effective assistance of counsel." (Report and Recommendation at p. 5) Respondents filed their Response to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on August 13, 2015. No reply was filed. On November 19, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be dismissed with prejudice.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. (Doc. 16)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing it with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.