Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mendoza v. General Motors LLC, 1:16-cv-00967-LJO-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171114819 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2017
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO THE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME NO LATER THAN (Doc. 36) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Defendant seeks an order shortening time to hear its motion to extend the discovery deadlines. (Doc. 36) Pursuant to Local Rule 144(e), "Ex parte applications to shorten time will not be granted except upon affidavit of counsel showing a satisfactory explanation for the need for the issuance of such an order and for the failure of c
More

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO THE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME NO LATER THAN

(Doc. 36)

Defendant seeks an order shortening time to hear its motion to extend the discovery deadlines. (Doc. 36) Pursuant to Local Rule 144(e), "Ex parte applications to shorten time will not be granted except upon affidavit of counsel showing a satisfactory explanation for the need for the issuance of such an order and for the failure of counsel to obtain a stipulation for the issuance of such an order from other counsel or parties in the action." Here, Defendant has not explained why the amended deadline was not requested via a stipulation, or whether Plaintiff objects to the shortening time.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS: Plaintiff SHALL file her opposition or notice of non-opposition to the motion for an order shortening time no later than November 15, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer