ARVIN v. U.S., 2:12cv357-MEF. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140422782
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On March 27, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 11). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On March 27, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 11). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because ..
More
ORDER
MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.
On March 27, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 11). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the § 2255 motion was filed after the expiration of the applicable limitation period.
Source: Leagle
