Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sandine v. Tate, 3:17-cv-151-DPM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20190227983 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to General Order 54, the Court authorizes Randy Taub to bring a cell phone, laptop computer, or personal digital assistant into the E.C. Gathings Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Jonesboro on 1 March 2019 for the pretrial and 11-15 March 2019 for the trial in this case. The following rules apply to this access: • The devices mentioned may not be used to record, photograph, or film anyone or anything inside the courthouse.
More

ORDER

Pursuant to General Order 54, the Court authorizes Randy Taub to bring a cell phone, laptop computer, or personal digital assistant into the E.C. Gathings Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Jonesboro on 1 March 2019 for the pretrial and 11-15 March 2019 for the trial in this case.

The following rules apply to this access:

• The devices mentioned may not be used to record, photograph, or film anyone or anything inside the courthouse. • Cell phones and PDAs must be turned off and put away when in the courtroom. • Wireless internet components of all electronic devices must be deactivated when in the courtroom. • Only counsel, and support staff at counsel table, may use laptops in the courtroom. • Before persons with electronic devices are granted entry into the courthouse, all devices must be examined by the United States Marshals Service or Court Security Personnel. This examination includes, but is not limited to, placing the device through the electronic screening machines and requiring the person possessing the device to turn the power to the device off and on. • The United States Marshals Service may further restrict electronic devices from entering the building if a threat so requires.

A violation of these rules may result in seizure of the electronic devices, withdrawal of the privilege to bring an electronic device into the courthouse, or other sanctions. A violation of the prohibition on recording, photographing, or filming anyone or anything inside the courthouse may be punished as contempt of court.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer