Filed: Sep. 25, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-11914 September 25, 2008 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 05-00720-CV-CG-M BILL SALTER ADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF ATMORE, a municipal corporation of the State of Alabama, ALLEN NIX, as Building Inspector of the City of Atmore, TROY KING, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Defendants-Appellees. _ App
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-11914 September 25, 2008 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 05-00720-CV-CG-M BILL SALTER ADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF ATMORE, a municipal corporation of the State of Alabama, ALLEN NIX, as Building Inspector of the City of Atmore, TROY KING, as Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appe..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-11914 September 25, 2008
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 05-00720-CV-CG-M
BILL SALTER ADVERTISING, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF ATMORE,
a municipal corporation of the State of Alabama,
ALLEN NIX,
as Building Inspector of the City of Atmore,
TROY KING,
as Attorney General of the State of Alabama,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(September 25, 2008)
Before MARCUS, WILSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Plaintiff, Bill Salter Advertising, Inc. ("BSA") appeals, challenging the
district court's denial of BSA's motion for summary judgment and the grant of
summary judgment in favor of the Defendants.
At issue on this appeal are BSA's challenges to § 9.521 and Note 7 of an
ordinance promulgated by the City of Atmore in 1998.
We have carefully considered BSA's arguments and relevant parts of the
record. We conclude that the district court properly determined that BSA's
constitutional attacks on § 9.521 and Note 7 were without merit. Summary
judgment in favor of the Defendants was proper.
AFFIRMED.
2