SMITH v. FORNISS, 2:12cv-975-WHA. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150422804
Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16), entered on March 31, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED as it was not filed within the applicable period of limitations established by federal law. 2. This cas
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16), entered on March 31, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED as it was not filed within the applicable period of limitations established by federal law. 2. This case..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #16), entered on March 31, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a de novo review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED as it was not filed within the applicable period of limitations established by federal law.
2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
