Davis v. Dorman, 4:19-cv-04014. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191205774
Visitors: 34
Filed: Dec. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoena for Body Cam Footage and Also Control Buy Footage. (ECF No. 59). In this motion Plaintiff asks the Court to "subpoena a copy of the Body Camera Footage from August 30th and the controlled by video from Oct 3rd, 2018 so that innocence can be proven." Id. Plaintiff has failed to identify where the video footage was recorded, who recorded the video footage, and which Defendant(s) has possession o
Summary: ORDER BARRY A. BRYANT , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoena for Body Cam Footage and Also Control Buy Footage. (ECF No. 59). In this motion Plaintiff asks the Court to "subpoena a copy of the Body Camera Footage from August 30th and the controlled by video from Oct 3rd, 2018 so that innocence can be proven." Id. Plaintiff has failed to identify where the video footage was recorded, who recorded the video footage, and which Defendant(s) has possession of..
More
ORDER
BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoena for Body Cam Footage and Also Control Buy Footage. (ECF No. 59).
In this motion Plaintiff asks the Court to "subpoena a copy of the Body Camera Footage from August 30th and the controlled by video from Oct 3rd, 2018 so that innocence can be proven." Id. Plaintiff has failed to identify where the video footage was recorded, who recorded the video footage, and which Defendant(s) has possession of the video footage so that a subpoena can be issued. Consequently, the Court is unable to grant Plaintiff's request for a subpoena as written.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoena for Body Cam Footage and Also Control Buy Footage (ECF No. 59) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle