BROWN v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, 4:16-CV-00902 BSM. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20170509615
Visitors: 12
Filed: May 08, 2017
Latest Update: May 08, 2017
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 31] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Brown's complaint is dismissed without prejudice, all pending motions are denied as moot, and it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in g
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 31] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Brown's complaint is dismissed without prejudice, all pending motions are denied as moot, and it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in go..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 31] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris have been received. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Brown's complaint is dismissed without prejudice, all pending motions are denied as moot, and it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
