Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Bolden, 2:11-CR-00054-TLN. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140729809 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2014
Summary: APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR MONEY JUDGMENT TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. On December 12, 2013, defendant Michael Bolden entered a guilty plea to Count Three of the Superseding Indictment, which charges him with wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343. On December 12, 2013, defendant Victor Alvarado entered a guilty plea to Count One of the Superseding Information, which charges his with conspiracy to commit wire fraud a violation of 18 U.S.C. 371, and Count Two of the Superseding Inform
More

APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR MONEY JUDGMENT

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

On December 12, 2013, defendant Michael Bolden entered a guilty plea to Count Three of the Superseding Indictment, which charges him with wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

On December 12, 2013, defendant Victor Alvarado entered a guilty plea to Count One of the Superseding Information, which charges his with conspiracy to commit wire fraud a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and Count Two of the Superseding Information, which charges his with making false statements to a federal agency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001.

On December 5, 2013, defendants Nicholo Arceo and Erica Arceo entered a guilty plea to a Superseding Information, which charges them with conspiracy to commit wire fraud a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371.

As part of his plea agreement with the United States, defendant Michael Bolden agreed to forfeit voluntarily and immediately up to $26,000,000.00, as a personal money judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(1), which reflects a reasonable compromise between the parties for forfeiture purposes concerning the proceeds the defendant obtained as a result of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, to which he has pled guilty. See Defendant Bolden's Plea Agreement ¶ II.F.

As part of his plea agreement with the United States, defendant Victor Alvarado agreed to forfeit voluntarily and immediately up to $3,600,000.00, as a personal money judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(1), which reflects a reasonable compromise between the parties for forfeiture purposes concerning the proceeds the defendant obtained as a result of a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1001, to which he has pled guilty. See Defendant Alvarado's Plea Agreement ¶ II.F.

As part of their plea agreement with the United States, defendants Nicholo Arceo and Erica Arceo agreed to forfeit voluntarily and immediately up to $758,007.30, as a personal money judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(1), which reflects a reasonable compromise between the parties for forfeiture purposes concerning the proceeds the defendants obtained as a result of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, to which they have pled guilty. See Defendants Arceo's Plea Agreement ¶ II.G. Plaintiff hereby applies for entry of a money judgment as follows:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(1), the Court shall impose a personal forfeiture money judgment against the defendants as follows:

a. Michael Bolden in the amount of $26,000.000.00; b. Victor Alvarado in the amount of $3,600,000.00; and c. Nicholo Arceo and Erica Arceo in the amount of $758,007.30.

2. The above-referenced personal forfeiture money judgment is imposed based on defendants Michael Bolden, Victor Alvarado, Nicholo Arceo and Erica Arceo's conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Bolden), 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Alvarado) and 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Alvarado) and 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Nicholo and Erica Arceo) . Said amount reflects a reasonable compromise between the parties for forfeiture purposes concerning the proceeds the defendants obtained, which the defendants agreed is subject to forfeiture based on the offense of convictions. Any funds applied towards such judgment shall be forfeited to the United States of America and disposed of as provided for by law.

3. Payment of the personal forfeiture money judgment should be made in the form of a cashier's check made payable to the U.S. Marshals Service and sent to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Attn: Asset Forfeiture Unit, 501 I Street, Suite 10-100, Sacramento, CA 95814. Prior to the imposition of sentence, any funds delivered to the United States to satisfy the personal money judgment shall be seized and held by the U.S. Marshals Service, in its secure custody and control.

ORDER

For good cause shown, the Court hereby imposes a personal forfeiture money judgment against defendants as follows:

a. Michael Bolden in the amount of $26,000.000.00; b. Victor Alvarado in the amount of $3,600,000.00; and c. Nicholo Arceo and Erica Arceo in the amount of $758,007.30.

Any funds applied towards such judgment shall be forfeited to the United States of America and disposed of as provided for by law. Prior to the imposition of sentence, any funds delivered to the United States to satisfy the personal money judgment shall be seized and held by the U.S. Marshals Service, in its secure custody and control.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer