Floyd v. PEM Real Estate Group, 1:17-cv-451-TFM-N. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190215743
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER TERRY F. MOORER , District Judge . On January 9, 2019, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation which recommends the Motion for Judgment filed by Defendant HW Mobile Investco LLC be granted. See Doc. 96. Plaintiff filed her objections on January 25, 2019 which is more than 14 days after the entry of the report and recommendation. See Doc. 97. Though normally pro se parties are given the benefit of mailing time, Plaintiff was previously given the ability to elect
Summary: ORDER TERRY F. MOORER , District Judge . On January 9, 2019, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation which recommends the Motion for Judgment filed by Defendant HW Mobile Investco LLC be granted. See Doc. 96. Plaintiff filed her objections on January 25, 2019 which is more than 14 days after the entry of the report and recommendation. See Doc. 97. Though normally pro se parties are given the benefit of mailing time, Plaintiff was previously given the ability to electr..
More
ORDER
TERRY F. MOORER, District Judge.
On January 9, 2019, the magistrate judge entered a report and recommendation which recommends the Motion for Judgment filed by Defendant HW Mobile Investco LLC be granted. See Doc. 96. Plaintiff filed her objections on January 25, 2019 which is more than 14 days after the entry of the report and recommendation. See Doc. 97. Though normally pro se parties are given the benefit of mailing time, Plaintiff was previously given the ability to electronically file and therefore the objections are two days late. Defendant timely responded to the objections and noted their tardiness. See Doc. 98. Regardless of whether they were timely and whether the court applies a de novo or clearly erroneous standard, the objections lack merit and are overruled.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and Investco's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 83) is GRANTED.
This remainder of this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
