SMITH v. KELLEY, 5:15-CV-00025 BRW. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150403575
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have received the Findings and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Doc. No. 10) and the Objections by Petitioner James Edward Smith (Doc. No. 11). After a careful, de novo review of the record, I adopt as my findings in all respects the Findings and Recommendation in their entirety. Accordingly, Mr. Smith's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is dismissed; all requested relief is denied; and a judgment wi
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have received the Findings and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Doc. No. 10) and the Objections by Petitioner James Edward Smith (Doc. No. 11). After a careful, de novo review of the record, I adopt as my findings in all respects the Findings and Recommendation in their entirety. Accordingly, Mr. Smith's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is dismissed; all requested relief is denied; and a judgment wil..
More
ORDER
BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge.
I have received the Findings and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Doc. No. 10) and the Objections by Petitioner James Edward Smith (Doc. No. 11).
After a careful, de novo review of the record, I adopt as my findings in all respects the Findings and Recommendation in their entirety. Accordingly, Mr. Smith's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed; all requested relief is denied; and a judgment will be entered for respondent Wendy Kelly.
A certificate of appealability is also denied.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. See Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts.
Source: Leagle
