Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Catar Clinic of Hot Springs, LLC v. Robinson, 4:17-cv-520-DPM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20180613999 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . The Court received the attached note and cover letter from Steppig with the motion to compel, N o 199. So Ordered. Chase L. Steppig 440 Louisiana Street, Suite 900 Houston, TX 77002 Phone 713-429-5208 June 6, 2018 Richard Shepard Arnold Courthouse Honorable Judge D. P. Marshall 600 West Capitol, Room B 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: CASE NO: 4: 17-CV-520-DPM Your Honor: In the June 4, 2018, hearing al I parties attorneys were able to ma
More

ORDER

The Court received the attached note and cover letter from Steppig with the motion to compel, No 199.

So Ordered.

Chase L. Steppig 440 Louisiana Street, Suite 900 Houston, TX 77002 Phone 713-429-5208 June 6, 2018

Richard Shepard Arnold Courthouse Honorable Judge D. P. Marshall 600 West Capitol, Room B 149 Little Rock, AR 72201

RE: CASE NO: 4: 17-CV-520-DPM

Your Honor:

In the June 4, 2018, hearing al I parties attorneys were able to make statements regarding the Plaintiffs TRO. The parties were notified at 1:35pm CST of a 2:00pm CST telephone hearing. John Buzbee emailed me notice of the hearing on June 4, 2018, at 2:00pm CST and I did not check my emails until after the hearing was over.

From what Mr. Buzbee told me after the telephone hearing. The bulk of the discussion and a majority of the TRO revolves around me individually which, I am prose in this matter. In an effort to reduce future involvement of the Court and avoid having yet another preliminary injunction hearing. I kindly ask the Court to allow me approximately 15 minutes after the show cause hearing to speak to the Court regarding my response to the Plaintiffs TRO and to ask for clarification on several items so, the parties can have a clear understanding and to avoid future unnecessary involvement of the Court. The Court has already made its ruling on the TRO and there is absolutely no reason for witnesses to be called . I anticipate that the Plaintiffs will use this opportunity to go on yet another fishing expedition and call witnesses. The Court has already made its ruling and hopefully, the Court will not allow the Plaintiffs to go on another fishing expedition.

The past few hearings have had a tendency to run significantly longer than anticipated. I need to be at the airport at approximately 4:30pm and would ask the Court to grant each side a specific amount of time and not allow anything over the allotted time.

Respectfully Submitted, ________________________________________ Chase Steppig CC: John Buzbee (via email) CC: James Rankin (via email) CC: Luther Suttor (via email) CC: Bryce Brewer (via email
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer