Westrip v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-01093-DMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181121a33
Visitors: 24
Filed: Nov. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended until December 14, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond. Defense counsel requires additional time to fully review the administrative record and consider the government's position due
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended until December 14, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond. Defense counsel requires additional time to fully review the administrative record and consider the government's position due ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended until December 14, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond. Defense counsel requires additional time to fully review the administrative record and consider the government's position due to conflicting due dates and Defense counsel's scheduled use/lose leave. Plaintiff's counsel does not object to the extension and agrees that all subsequent deadlines should be accordingly extended.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
Source: Leagle
