Filed: Jun. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2018
Summary: MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. FORD , Magistrate Judge . This is a civil rights action filed by the Plaintiff, Todd Griffin, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and (3)(2011), the Hon. Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge, referred this case to the undersigned for the purpose of making a Report and Recommendation. On April 24, 2018, the Court entered an Order directing the Plaintiff to provide an additional addr
Summary: MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. FORD , Magistrate Judge . This is a civil rights action filed by the Plaintiff, Todd Griffin, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and (3)(2011), the Hon. Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge, referred this case to the undersigned for the purpose of making a Report and Recommendation. On April 24, 2018, the Court entered an Order directing the Plaintiff to provide an additional addre..
More
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MARK E. FORD, Magistrate Judge.
This is a civil rights action filed by the Plaintiff, Todd Griffin, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1) and (3)(2011), the Hon. Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge, referred this case to the undersigned for the purpose of making a Report and Recommendation.
On April 24, 2018, the Court entered an Order directing the Plaintiff to provide an additional address or identifying information to use in serving Defendant, T. J. Burnett. (ECF No. 19). Plaintiff was ordered to provide this information by May 15, 2018. Plaintiff was also advised that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of the party from the case. (Id.). To date, Plaintiff has not provided additional information regarding the Defendant, T. J. Burnett.
Accordingly, it is recommended that the Defendant, T. J. Burnett, be dismissed as a party from this case without prejudice.
The parties have fourteen days from receipt of the Report and Recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. Plaintiff is reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court.
