Ward v. Burl, 5:16-cv-110-DPM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180524898
Visitors: 23
Filed: May 23, 2018
Latest Update: May 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . 1. Embedded motions for an extension and for appointed counsel, N o 136 at 10, denied. The Court previously gave Ward an extra thirty days to file his objections. And none of the material circumstances have changed since the Court denied Ward's most recent motion for an appointed lawyer. N o 135. 2. On de nova review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Harris' s careful recommendation, N o 133 , and overrules Ward's objecti
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . 1. Embedded motions for an extension and for appointed counsel, N o 136 at 10, denied. The Court previously gave Ward an extra thirty days to file his objections. And none of the material circumstances have changed since the Court denied Ward's most recent motion for an appointed lawyer. N o 135. 2. On de nova review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Harris' s careful recommendation, N o 133 , and overrules Ward's objectio..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
1. Embedded motions for an extension and for appointed counsel, No 136 at 10, denied. The Court previously gave Ward an extra thirty days to file his objections. And none of the material circumstances have changed since the Court denied Ward's most recent motion for an appointed lawyer. No 135.
2. On de nova review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Harris' s careful recommendation, No 133, and overrules Ward's objections, NQ 136. Burl's motion for summary judgment, No 107, is granted. Ward's remaining claims will be dismissed with prejudice.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
