LINDSEY v. GRIFFIN, 5:14CV00073-DPM-JTK. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140903a40
Visitors: 21
Filed: Sep. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER JEROME T. KEARNEY, Magistrate Judge. Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's August 26, 2014 Order (Doc. No. 76) is GRANTED. 1 The August 26, 2014 Order is hereby modified as follows: "Plaintiff's Subsequent Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED IN PART, and Defendants shall ensure that Plaintiff is provided the opportunity within fifteen days of this Order to review his physical institutional and medical jackets. In addition, the Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff a c
Summary: ORDER JEROME T. KEARNEY, Magistrate Judge. Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's August 26, 2014 Order (Doc. No. 76) is GRANTED. 1 The August 26, 2014 Order is hereby modified as follows: "Plaintiff's Subsequent Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED IN PART, and Defendants shall ensure that Plaintiff is provided the opportunity within fifteen days of this Order to review his physical institutional and medical jackets. In addition, the Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff a co..
More
ORDER
JEROME T. KEARNEY, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's August 26, 2014 Order (Doc. No. 76) is GRANTED.1 The August 26, 2014 Order is hereby modified as follows:
"Plaintiff's Subsequent Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED IN PART, and Defendants shall ensure that Plaintiff is provided the opportunity within fifteen days of this Order to review his physical institutional and medical jackets. In addition, the Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff a copy of Doc. No. 58-1.
Plaintiff's Subsequent Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 64) is DENIED in all other respects."
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Defendants' counsel erroneously indicated to the Court in their prior Response (Doc. No. 58) that Plaintiff could review EOMIS and electronic case files. Counsel states in the present Motion that ADC policy does not permit inmates to review the electronic EOMIS files.
Source: Leagle
