Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:17-cv-01504-RFB-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180905a40 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND MOTION DEADLINE PER MARCH 23, 2018 ORDER [DOC. NO. 38] FIRST REQUEST CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rules 6-1, 26-1 and 26-4, Plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF11, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF11 ("Deutsche Bank"); Defendant SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), and Lamplight Square at Coronado Ranch Homeowners Associati
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND MOTION DEADLINE PER MARCH 23, 2018 ORDER [DOC. NO. 38] FIRST REQUEST

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rules 6-1, 26-1 and 26-4, Plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF11, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF11 ("Deutsche Bank"); Defendant SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC ("SFR"), and Lamplight Square at Coronado Ranch Homeowners Association ("HOA") (collectively, the "Stipulating Parties"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order to extend the briefing schedule as set forth in this Court's March 23, 2018 Order ["Order", Doc. No. 38]. This is the Stipulating Parties' first request for extension of this briefing schedule. Under the Order, Deutsche Bank's response brief is due on September 13, 20181. The parties stipulate that Deutsche Bank's responses to the renewed motions to dismiss filed by SFR and HOA on August 23, 2018 and August 27, 2018, respectively [Doc. Nos. 41 and 42] will be due on September 28, 2018. All reply briefs will be due on October 26, 2018.

The motion deadline set forth in the Order is not the dispositive motion deadline for the action. At the time this case was stayed on March 26, 2018 [Doc. No. 38], the parties were conducting discovery pursuant to a September 20, 2017 discovery plan and scheduling order [Doc. No. 30], with approximately 2.5 months remaining in discovery, and 3.5 months remaining until the dispositive motion deadline of July 5, 2018.

This request to extend the briefing schedule is made in good faith, and is not for purpose of delay or prejudice to any party, but to allow all parties sufficient time to prepare their responses and reply briefs to the Motion.

The requested extensions will not result in undue delay or prejudice to any party, as the stay has not been lifted and the parties have not submitted an amended discovery plan or scheduling order since the stay was imposed on March 23, 2018. A revised dispositive motion deadline will be included in the discovery plan to be filed after the stay is lifted.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Under the Order, the Court denied SFR's motion to dismiss without prejudice and stated that the moving party shall have 21 days from the date of the Nevada Supreme Court's decision on the certified question to file a modified motion to dismiss or a notice renewing the prior motion. The Court indicated that the opposing party shall have 21 days to respond, and the moving party shall have 14 days to reply. (Order, 1:24-28.)
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer