Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Babin-De-Jesus v. American Express Co., 2:16-cv-00636-RFB-GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160523a52 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 18, 2016
Latest Update: May 18, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO (THIRD REQUEST GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Jose R. Babin-De-Jesus, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., erroneously named as Wells Fargo Financial Cards ("Wells Fargo"), by and through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., hereby stipulate to extend the time for Wells Fargo to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. WHEREAS, on March 23, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in the United
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO (THIRD REQUEST

Plaintiff Jose R. Babin-De-Jesus, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., erroneously named as Wells Fargo Financial Cards ("Wells Fargo"), by and through its attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., hereby stipulate to extend the time for Wells Fargo to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

WHEREAS, on March 23, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in the United States District Court, District of Nevada;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend Wells Fargo's time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and to serve Initial Disclosures to consider potential resolution of this matter and;

WHEREAS this request is not made for purposes of delay and is supported by good cause;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties as follows:

1. Wells Fargo shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before June 13, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before June 13, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer