Filed: Nov. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made on the record on November 13, 2015, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the Retroactivity Screening Panel (doc. no. 93) is set for submission, without oral argument, on November 27, 2015. (2) The government is to file, by no later than noon on November 23, 2015, a brief stating its position on whether United States v. Glover , 686 F.3d 1203 (11th Cir. 2012), or Amendment 780, U.S.S.G. 1B1.10(
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made on the record on November 13, 2015, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The recommendation of the Retroactivity Screening Panel (doc. no. 93) is set for submission, without oral argument, on November 27, 2015. (2) The government is to file, by no later than noon on November 23, 2015, a brief stating its position on whether United States v. Glover , 686 F.3d 1203 (11th Cir. 2012), or Amendment 780, U.S.S.G. 1B1.10(c..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Based on the representations made on the record on November 13, 2015, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The recommendation of the Retroactivity Screening Panel (doc. no. 93) is set for submission, without oral argument, on November 27, 2015.
(2) The government is to file, by no later than noon on November 23, 2015, a brief stating its position on whether United States v. Glover, 686 F.3d 1203 (11th Cir. 2012), or Amendment 780, U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c), controls as to the eligibility of the defendant (who originally received a sentence below the applicable statutory mandatory minimum on the basis of a government motion for a downward departure to reflect substantial assistance) for a further sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).
(3) Defense counsel is to file a response by no later than noon on November 27, 2015.
