Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gerth v. Huffman, CV-17-01945-PHX-SMB. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20190213772 Visitors: 23
Filed: Feb. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BRNOVICH , District Judge . Plaintiff Arthur F. Gerth has filed a Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 alleging excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment (Doc. 20). United States Magistrate Eileen Willett has issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to follow Court orders. (Doc. 65). No objection has been fi
More

ORDER

Plaintiff Arthur F. Gerth has filed a Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment (Doc. 20).

United States Magistrate Eileen Willett has issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to follow Court orders. (Doc. 65). No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and dismiss the Complaint without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to follow Court orders.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 65) is accepted.

2. The Civil Rights Complaint (Doc. 20) is dismissed without prejudice.

3. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Doc. 62) is denied as moot.

4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer