Filed: Apr. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2014
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSAN Y. ILLSTON, District Judge. The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 1. Claims asserted by Plaintiffs AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Co., AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company against Defendant HannStar Display Corporation are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER SUSAN Y. ILLSTON, District Judge. The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 1. Claims asserted by Plaintiffs AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Co., AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company against Defendant HannStar Display Corporation are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER
SUSAN Y. ILLSTON, District Judge.
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows:
1. Claims asserted by Plaintiffs AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Co., AT&T Operations, Inc., AT&T Datacomm, Inc., and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company against Defendant HannStar Display Corporation are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
