Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Zotos v. Colvin, 1:16-CV-0060 (BAM). (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170323891 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO EAJA 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Sunnie Zotos ("Plaintiff") be awarded attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412 (d), in the amount of four thousand two hundred ten dollars and six cents ($4,210
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO EAJA 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval of the Court, that Sunnie Zotos ("Plaintiff") be awarded attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. §2412 (d), in the amount of four thousand two hundred ten dollars and six cents ($4,210.06) and seven dollars and seventeen cents ($7.17) in postage expenses, for a total of four thousand two hundred seventeen dollars and twenty-three cents ($4,217.23). This represents compensation for legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§1920; 2412 (d).

After the Court issues an Order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the attorney fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the Order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt subject to offset, then the government shall cause the payment of fees approved to be made payable to Melissa Newel or Newel Law (collectively "Plaintiff's counsel"), pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and costs in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b), subject to the provisions of the EAJA.

ORDER

Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of four thousand two hundred and seventeen dollars and twenty three cents ($4,217.23), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §2412, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §405(g).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer