TATOM v. CORIZON, INC., 2:13-cv-35-DPM-HDY. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130820746
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 19, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2013
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. Tatom has not objected to Magistrate Judge H. David Young's recommendation, No. 51, that the Court dismiss his complaint for failure to prosecute. Reviewing for clear error of fact on the face of the record and for legal error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Note), the Court adopts Judge Young's recommendation in full. Tatom's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The pending motions, No. 37, 41 & 48, are denied as m
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. Tatom has not objected to Magistrate Judge H. David Young's recommendation, No. 51, that the Court dismiss his complaint for failure to prosecute. Reviewing for clear error of fact on the face of the record and for legal error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Note), the Court adopts Judge Young's recommendation in full. Tatom's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The pending motions, No. 37, 41 & 48, are denied as mo..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
Tatom has not objected to Magistrate Judge H. David Young's recommendation, No. 51, that the Court dismiss his complaint for failure to prosecute. Reviewing for clear error of fact on the face of the record and for legal error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Note), the Court adopts Judge Young's recommendation in full. Tatom's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The pending motions, No. 37, 41 & 48, are denied as moot. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
