Rasul v. Kelley, 5:16-CV-00041-JM-JTR. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180911587
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habe
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habea..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE; and
2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
