CLIFTON v. WOLFE, 2:17CV00024-BRW. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20170616845
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff=s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety. Accordingly, Defendant Wolfe's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED. The rationale advanced by Defendant Wolfe also a
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff=s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety. Accordingly, Defendant Wolfe's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED. The rationale advanced by Defendant Wolfe also ap..
More
ORDER
BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge.
I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff=s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety.
Accordingly, Defendant Wolfe's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED. The rationale advanced by Defendant Wolfe also applies to Defendant Barnes. Therefore, Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the Recommendations, and the accompanying Judgment, would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
