MIKE ROGERS DRILLING COMPANY v. NIPPON STEEL AND SUMITOMO METAL CORPORATION, 1:14-cv-1015. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140505954
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 02, 2014
Latest Update: May 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is a Second Agreed Motion to Extend Response Deadline filed on behalf of the parties. (ECF No. 11). The parties move the Court to extend the deadline for Defendants Riteco Supply and Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (ECF No. 1). Upon consideration, the Court is satisfied that good cause for the motion has been shown. Accordingly, the Court finds that the motion (ECF No. 11) should be and he
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is a Second Agreed Motion to Extend Response Deadline filed on behalf of the parties. (ECF No. 11). The parties move the Court to extend the deadline for Defendants Riteco Supply and Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (ECF No. 1). Upon consideration, the Court is satisfied that good cause for the motion has been shown. Accordingly, the Court finds that the motion (ECF No. 11) should be and her..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Second Agreed Motion to Extend Response Deadline filed on behalf of the parties. (ECF No. 11). The parties move the Court to extend the deadline for Defendants Riteco Supply and Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corporation to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (ECF No. 1). Upon consideration, the Court is satisfied that good cause for the motion has been shown. Accordingly, the Court finds that the motion (ECF No. 11) should be and hereby is GRANTED. Defendants' responses to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) are due on or before June 9, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
