Filed: Feb. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. Nos. 3, 26, 36), are DENIED. IT IS SO ORD
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. Nos. 3, 26, 36), are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDE..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. Nos. 3, 26, 36), are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
