Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnson v. Gold Touch Investment SPE, LLC, 18-cv-05881-VKD. (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20200211b54 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been informed that the parties have settled this dispute, all previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are VACATED. On or before April 10, 2020, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii). Rule 41(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss a case without a court order (i) by notice if the defendants have not filed an answer or motion for sum
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT

The Court having been informed that the parties have settled this dispute, all previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are VACATED.

On or before April 10, 2020, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii). Rule 41(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss a case without a court order (i) by notice if the defendants have not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, or (ii) by stipulation signed by all parties who have appeared. Because defendants have filed answers to the complaint, plaintiff must file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii).

If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California 95113 on April 21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. and show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). If a dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer