Whitaker v. M and J USA, Inc., CV 19-08785-AB (ASx). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200129908
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41) ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . On January 10, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than January 23, 2020. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, with
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41) ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . On January 10, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than January 23, 2020. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, witho..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
(PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41)
ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
On January 10, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than January 23, 2020. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41.
Source: Leagle
