Johnson v. Nicholson Family Partnership, 18-cv-03717-VKD. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181121b52
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Scott Johnson filed the present action on June 22, 2018. Dkt. No. 1. Pursuant to General Order No. 56, the parties' last day to conduct a joint site inspection was October 5, 2018, and Mr. Johnson's last day to file a notice of need for mediation was November 16, 2018. Dkt. No. 5. Mr. Johnson did not file a notice of need for mediation. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismis
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Scott Johnson filed the present action on June 22, 2018. Dkt. No. 1. Pursuant to General Order No. 56, the parties' last day to conduct a joint site inspection was October 5, 2018, and Mr. Johnson's last day to file a notice of need for mediation was November 16, 2018. Dkt. No. 5. Mr. Johnson did not file a notice of need for mediation. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Scott Johnson filed the present action on June 22, 2018. Dkt. No. 1. Pursuant to General Order No. 56, the parties' last day to conduct a joint site inspection was October 5, 2018, and Mr. Johnson's last day to file a notice of need for mediation was November 16, 2018. Dkt. No. 5. Mr. Johnson did not file a notice of need for mediation.
The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte "to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases." Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 (1962). Mr. Johnson is directed to file a written response to this order by November 27, 2018 and to appear before the Court on December 4, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California 95113 and show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
