Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Walintukan v. SBE Entertainment Group, LLC, 3:16-cv-01311-JST. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161201g27 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiff Deric Walintukan and Defendants SBE Entertainment Group, LLC; 6021 Hollywood Investor, LLC; and 6021 Hollywood Operating Company, LLC submit this Stipulation to reschedule the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To File First Amended Complaint from January 19, 2017 to February 9, 2017. Plaintiff and Defendants
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Deric Walintukan and Defendants SBE Entertainment Group, LLC; 6021 Hollywood Investor, LLC; and 6021 Hollywood Operating Company, LLC submit this Stipulation to reschedule the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To File First Amended Complaint from January 19, 2017 to February 9, 2017. Plaintiff and Defendants further stipulate to (1) an extension of time for Defendants to oppose Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To File First Amended Complaint from December 7, 2016 to December 30, 2016 and (2) an extension of time for Plaintiff to file his reply to Defendants' opposition from December 21, 2016 to January 26, 2017. Good cause exists to grant this Stipulation for the following reasons:

1. Plaintiff filed his Notice of Motion and Motion For Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 43) ("Motion") on November 9, 2016.

2. Pursuant to this Court's Order of October 20, 2016 (Dkt. 41), the Motion is set for hearing on January 19, 2017, Defendants' opposition is due on December 7, 2016, and Plaintiff's reply is due on December 21, 2016.

3. Defendants require additional time to oppose Plaintiff's motion due to recent unexpected scheduling issues associated with other engagements which require out of town travel.

4. In the event that Defendants are given additional time to oppose Plaintiff's motion and the opposition deadline is moved back, Plaintiff will require additional time to respond to Defendants' opposition due to similar time constraints owing from the intervening holidays and other matters. Specifically, Plaintiff's counsel will be out of town between Christmas and New Years', has a final approval motion in an automobile class action due on January 9, 2017 and a trial scheduled to begin on January 25, 2016.

5. Trial has not been set.

6. No party will suffer any prejudice if the Court grants the requested relief, and granting the requested relief will not unduly delay this litigation.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to Court approval, that:

1. The hearing on Plaintiff's Motion shall take place on February 9, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. or a later date to be set by the Court.

2. Defendants' opposition to the Motion shall be filed by December 30, 2016.

3. Plaintiff's reply in support of the Motion shall be filed by January 26, 2017.

ATTESTATION REGARDING SIGNATURES

I, Ari N. Rothman, attest that all signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing's content and have authorized the filing.

DATED: November 29, 2016 VENABLE LLP /s/Ari N. Rothman

* * *

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer