Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Candis Warner, 08-13461 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 08-13461 Visitors: 85
Filed: Sep. 03, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 3, 2009 No. 08-13461 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-80019-CR-KAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CANDIS WARNER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 3, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Davi
More
                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                     FILED
                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                         ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                             SEPTEMBER 3, 2009
                               No. 08-13461                  THOMAS K. KAHN
                           Non-Argument Calendar                  CLERK
                         ________________________

                     D. C. Docket No. 08-80019-CR-KAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

CANDIS WARNER,

                                                            Defendant-Appellant.


                         ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Florida
                        _________________________

                              (September 3, 2009)

Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     David J. Joffe, appointed counsel for Candis Warner in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Warner’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer