Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Huerta, 1:18-mj-00101. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181126815 Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . BACKGROUND Defendants Huerta and Corral made an initial appearance on June 29, 2018 pursuant to a summons issued in conjunction with a Criminal Complaint. On that date, the United States provided initial, voluntary discovery to the counsel for defendant. The parties are exploring whether a potential pre-indictment resolution is desirable, and the parties have made significant progress in that d
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING

BACKGROUND

Defendants Huerta and Corral made an initial appearance on June 29, 2018 pursuant to a summons issued in conjunction with a Criminal Complaint. On that date, the United States provided initial, voluntary discovery to the counsel for defendant. The parties are exploring whether a potential pre-indictment resolution is desirable, and the parties have made significant progress in that direction. However, the parties are requesting some additional time to finalize resolution or proceed forward.

This matter is currently scheduled for a preliminary hearing on November 26, 2018. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(c) requires that preliminary hearing occur within twenty-one days, but Rule 5.1(d) also provides that the time limits may be extended "one or more times" with the defendant's consent and a showing of good cause. Here, the parties agree that there is good cause for the further extension, as the parties have agreed on the basic terms of a pre-indictment resolution. A draft plea agreement and associated documents is currently undergoing final approval with the United States Attorney's Office and the government anticipates it will be transmitted to the defendants on or about November 26, 2018, the current date of the preliminary hearing. Should the parties reach final agreement on the terms of a pre-indictment resolution, they will seek an appearance before a district court. The parties therefore request that a preliminary hearing be re-set for January 22, 2019.

The parties also agree that time should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), which requires an indictment within 30 days of a defendant's arrest or service of a summons, for defense preparation, plea negotiation, and continuity of counsel.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys, that the preliminary hearing currently set for November 26, 2018 be continued to January 22, 2019. The parties agree to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act from November 26, 2018 to January 22, 2019, because the interest of the public and of the defendant in a public indictment and trial are outweighed by the need for defense preparation, plea negotiation, and continuity of counsel.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that the preliminary hearing currently set for November 26, 2018 is continued to January 22, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judger Sheila K. Oberto. The period from November 26, 2018 to January 22, 2019 shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b). The Court finds that he interest of the public and of the defendant in a public indictment and trial are outweighed by the need for defense preparation, plea negotiation, and continuity of counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer