Guillen v. Carrillo, 1:19-cv-00946-DAD-JDP. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190806925
Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMOVE TO STATE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS ECF No. 6 JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Marcos Casey Guillen is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action. The matter is before this court after being removed from Kern County Superior Court. See ECF No. 1. On July 31, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion to remove the case to state court, asserting that his complaint is based on state la
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMOVE TO STATE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS ECF No. 6 JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Marcos Casey Guillen is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action. The matter is before this court after being removed from Kern County Superior Court. See ECF No. 1. On July 31, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion to remove the case to state court, asserting that his complaint is based on state law..
More
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMOVE TO STATE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS
ECF No. 6
JEREMY D. PETERSON, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Marcos Casey Guillen is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action. The matter is before this court after being removed from Kern County Superior Court. See ECF No. 1. On July 31, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion to remove the case to state court, asserting that his complaint is based on state law and that a state court can adequately review any related federal claims. See ECF No. 6.
Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, defendant must file a response to plaintiff's motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
