HAUGHEY v. CENTRAL REFRIGERATED SERVICE, INC., 3:13CV00268 JM. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20151023i41
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . Pending is the Defendants' motion to dismiss Separate Defendants Central Leasing and Swift based upon lack of service. (Docket #38). No response has been filed. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Based upon the record, neither Central Leasing Inc. nor Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC have been served with the summons and complaint in this matter. No proof of service appears on the record. Accordingly, all of Plaintiff's claims
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . Pending is the Defendants' motion to dismiss Separate Defendants Central Leasing and Swift based upon lack of service. (Docket #38). No response has been filed. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Based upon the record, neither Central Leasing Inc. nor Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC have been served with the summons and complaint in this matter. No proof of service appears on the record. Accordingly, all of Plaintiff's claims a..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
Pending is the Defendants' motion to dismiss Separate Defendants Central Leasing and Swift based upon lack of service. (Docket #38). No response has been filed. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. Based upon the record, neither Central Leasing Inc. nor Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC have been served with the summons and complaint in this matter. No proof of service appears on the record. Accordingly, all of Plaintiff's claims against Central Leasing Inc. and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
