Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Wise, CR 12-111 EMC (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150804956 Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING RESTITUTION HEARING EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The United States, by and through its counsel AUSAs Benjamin Kingsley and Robin Harris, and the defendant William Wise, by and through his counsel Paul Wolf and James Stevens, stipulate and agree as follows. 1. The defense asked for a continuance of the restitution hearing set in this case for July 22, 2015 and the Court granted that continuance and set a new date for September 2, 2015. 2. Th
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING RESTITUTION HEARING

The United States, by and through its counsel AUSAs Benjamin Kingsley and Robin Harris, and the defendant William Wise, by and through his counsel Paul Wolf and James Stevens, stipulate and agree as follows.

1. The defense asked for a continuance of the restitution hearing set in this case for July 22, 2015 and the Court granted that continuance and set a new date for September 2, 2015.

2. The September 2, 2015 court date conflicts with Mr. Kingsley's previously scheduled time off.

3. The next available date that the court and both parties have available is September 30, 2015.

4. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the parties jointly stipulate and agree that the restitution hearing be continued until September 30, 2015. The parties request that the Court order that Mr. Wise continue to be housed in the Northern District of California so that he can be present for any future restitution proceedings.

SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the restitution hearing currently scheduled for September 2, 2015 in the above referenced matter be vacated and this matter be set on September 30, 2015 at 2:30 pm The Court orders that the defendant continue to be housed in the Northern District of California so that he can be present for any future restitution proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer