Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. De Le Rocha-Carlon, 1:14-cr-00227-AWI-BAM. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150603815 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 02, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING; EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney and LAUREL J. MONTOYA, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendants by and through their undersigned counsel of record hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status hearing June 22, 2015 at 1:00 p.m
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING; EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney and LAUREL J. MONTOYA, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendants by and through their undersigned counsel of record hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status hearing June 22, 2015 at 1:00 p.m.

2. By this stipulation, government moves to continue the status hearing to July 27, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. Time has previously been excluded to and through June 22, 2015. Defense counsel does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. The court is unavailable on the date currently set for status conference; b. Additional time is needed for complying with defense discovery requests, formulating offers, and the approval process as well as investigation related to the formulation and consideration of any offer to settle the matter; c. The parties have agreed to continue the date for the status conference to July 27, 2015; d. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of June 22, 2015 to July, 27, 2015, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at government's and defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants interest in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED that the 3rd STATUS CONFERENCE for both defendants, is continued from June 22, 2015 to July 27, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. before Judge McAuliffe. Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer