(PC) Gann v. Kokor, 1:18-cv-00084-BAM (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180130b77
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO REMOVAL OF ACTION (ECF Nos. 5, 6) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Nathaniel Marcus Gann ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff filed this action in Kings County Superior Court on August 16, 2017. On January 16, 2018, Defendants Cryer, Enenmoh, Kokor, and Lewis (collectively "Defen
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO REMOVAL OF ACTION (ECF Nos. 5, 6) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Nathaniel Marcus Gann ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff filed this action in Kings County Superior Court on August 16, 2017. On January 16, 2018, Defendants Cryer, Enenmoh, Kokor, and Lewis (collectively "Defend..
More
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO REMOVAL OF ACTION
(ECF Nos. 5, 6)
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Nathaniel Marcus Gann ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action in Kings County Superior Court on August 16, 2017. On January 16, 2018, Defendants Cryer, Enenmoh, Kokor, and Lewis (collectively "Defendants") removed the action and requested that the Court screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and that Defendants be allowed thirty days from the screening of the complaint to file a responsive pleading. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff filed an objection to the removal on January 25, 2018, which the Court construes as a motion to remand. (ECF Nos. 5, 6.)
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff's motion to remand within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be filed within seven (7) days from the date of service of a response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
