Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., 17-cv-01892-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180502h06
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 01, 2018
Latest Update: May 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO MODIFY THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 107. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to modify the case schedule by extending the deadline to amend pleadings from April 23, 2018 to 24 days after the completion of document production. Dkt. No. 107. Having reviewed the parties' briefing, the Court DENIES the motion. Plaintiffs have not shown that amendment to the schedule is warranted at this tim
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO MODIFY THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 107. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to modify the case schedule by extending the deadline to amend pleadings from April 23, 2018 to 24 days after the completion of document production. Dkt. No. 107. Having reviewed the parties' briefing, the Court DENIES the motion. Plaintiffs have not shown that amendment to the schedule is warranted at this time..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO MODIFY THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Re: Dkt. No. 107.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to modify the case schedule by extending the deadline to amend pleadings from April 23, 2018 to 24 days after the completion of document production. Dkt. No. 107. Having reviewed the parties' briefing, the Court DENIES the motion. Plaintiffs have not shown that amendment to the schedule is warranted at this time. The Court can assess whether Plaintiffs can meet the good cause standard if and when they seek leave to amend.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
