Filed: Nov. 13, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nov. 13, 2009 No. 09-13298 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 94-03136–CR-3-RV-MD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIO EUGENE PRIDE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 13, 2009) Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and COX, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Chet
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nov. 13, 2009 No. 09-13298 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 94-03136–CR-3-RV-MD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIO EUGENE PRIDE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 13, 2009) Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and COX, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Chet K..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Nov. 13, 2009
No. 09-13298 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 94-03136–CR-3-RV-MD
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARIO EUGENE PRIDE,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(November 13, 2009)
Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and COX, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Mario Eugene Pride in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pride’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2