Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Mario Eugene Pride, 09-13298 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 09-13298 Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 13, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nov. 13, 2009 No. 09-13298 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 94-03136–CR-3-RV-MD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIO EUGENE PRIDE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 13, 2009) Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and COX, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Chet
More
                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                      FILED
                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                         ________________________  ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                 Nov. 13, 2009
                                No. 09-13298                   THOMAS K. KAHN
                            Non-Argument Calendar                  CLERK
                          ________________________

                    D.C. Docket No. 94-03136–CR-3-RV-MD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

      versus

MARIO EUGENE PRIDE,
                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                          Northern District of Florida
                         _________________________

                               (November 13, 2009)

Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and COX, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

      Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Mario Eugene Pride in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pride’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer