Allen v. Kelly, 5:17-CV-00302-BRW-BD. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180524901
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 23, 2018
Latest Update: May 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have received a Partial Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, Mr. Allen's timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Recommendation in all respects. Plaintiff asserts that the Arkansas Department of Correction can be sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act — assuming that is true, it is irrelevant, since Plai
Summary: ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have received a Partial Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, Mr. Allen's timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Recommendation in all respects. Plaintiff asserts that the Arkansas Department of Correction can be sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act — assuming that is true, it is irrelevant, since Plain..
More
ORDER
BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge.
I have received a Partial Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, Mr. Allen's timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Recommendation in all respects.
Plaintiff asserts that the Arkansas Department of Correction can be sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act — assuming that is true, it is irrelevant, since Plaintiff is not asserting an ADA claim.
Accordingly, the Claims against the Arkansas Department of Correction and the Doe defendants are dismissed, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
