Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

New Vision Gaming & Development, Inc. v. Bally Gaming Inc., 2:17-cv-01559-APG-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180907a75 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c) THAT U.S. PATENTS NOS. 7,325,806 AND 7,451,987 ARE INVALID UNDER 35 U.S.C. 101 (FIRST REQUESTED EXTENSION) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6, and Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties, through counsel, Plaintiff NEW VISION GAMING AND DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, through Karl Andersen
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c) THAT U.S. PATENTS NOS. 7,325,806 AND 7,451,987 ARE INVALID UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101 (FIRST REQUESTED EXTENSION)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6, and Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, the parties, through counsel, Plaintiff NEW VISION GAMING AND DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, through Karl Andersen, Esq., and Defendant BALLY GAMING INC, dba BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, a Nevada corporation, through PERKINS COIE, LLP, and hereby stipulate and agree to enlarge the time for Plaintiff to file an opposition to the Motion for MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c) THAT U.S. PATENTS NOS. 7,325,806 AND 7,451,987 ARE INVALID UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Document 50)(the "Motion") filed by the Defendant and served on the Plaintiff on August 21, 2018.

The parties acknowledge (1) this is the FIRST REQUEST to enlarge the time to file an opposition to the Motion; and, (2) additional time is needed for the Plaintiff to adequately address all the issues raised by the Motion.

The parties acknowledge, given the date of service of the Motion by electronic delivery, that the last day for Plaintiff to file an opposition was September 4, 2018.

The parties further stipulate and agree to enlarge this period of time to file a Response from September 4, 2018, to September 18, 2018.

The parties further stipulate that the deadline to enter the REPLY in support of ECF #50 (Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings) be continued seven (7) additional calendar days from the standard deadline, or until October 2, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer