U.S. v. Barocca, CR 94-0470-01-EMC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160516751
Visitors: 29
Filed: May 13, 2016
Latest Update: May 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE UNDER 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Before the Court is the party's Stipulation Regarding Enlargement of Time to File Reply to Response to Motion to Reduce Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The stipulation seeks an enlargement of time for the Defendant to file a Reply to Response to Motion to Reduce Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and setting the re
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE UNDER 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Before the Court is the party's Stipulation Regarding Enlargement of Time to File Reply to Response to Motion to Reduce Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The stipulation seeks an enlargement of time for the Defendant to file a Reply to Response to Motion to Reduce Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and setting the rep..
More
ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the party's Stipulation Regarding Enlargement of Time to File Reply to Response to Motion to Reduce Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The stipulation seeks an enlargement of time for the Defendant to file a Reply to Response to Motion to Reduce Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and setting the reply date for June 10, 2016. After reviewing the stipulation, the Court will set the date for the reply date for June 10, 2016.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
